Two “race-neutral alternatives” are frequently proposed: a search for socioeconomic diversity, which is often a proxy for racial and ethnic diversity, and a plan to admit the top candidates from every high school, while trying to expand recruitment.
The court’s conservative majority was wary of plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina that take account of race to foster educational diversity.
Over 100 students gather outside the Supreme Court to support race-conscious college admissions policies, but others say it leads inequality in university admissions.
Monday’s Supreme Court oral arguments will probably focus on admissions to elite schools. But most low-income students of color come up against a different barrier.
If they do what it sounded like they will do, it will end the ability of colleges and universities, public and private, to consider race as one factor in admissions.
A ruling in the case is expected from the conservative-leaning court next year. It could overturn decades of precedent on affirmative action in higher education.
Chegg, a homework help app, exposed the data of 40 million users, including details about some students’ sexual orientation and religion, regulators said in a legal complaint.
The UNC system is proposing increase the number of out-of-state students at five of its universities, following a similar move at five of its other campuses that took effect this year.
The conservative justices seemed skeptical of the colleges’ longstanding practice. The more liberal minority wondered if a race-neutral strategy would exacerbate the very problem it was claiming to fix.