As Halloween approaches so do spooky films and one in particular, "Halloween Ends," is distinguished by its memorable theme song. We hear about why that theme has had such an impact and get a preview of the scary films out this year.
The court’s conservative supermajority may be skeptical of admissions programs at Harvard and U.N.C. that take account of race to foster educational diversity.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Monday about admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina — and the meaning of a civil rights landmark.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday in two key affirmative action cases. Here’s what the justices have said or written about race-conscious policies.
In today's edition … More from our reporting on the diversity of lawyers who argue before the Supreme Court ... Trail Mix: Worries in Connecticut for Democrats ... Isaac Arnsdorf reports that election denier Mark Finchem’s sleeper campaign closes in on MAGA prize ... What we know about the attack on Paul Pelosi ... A new proposal from the left to safeguard elections.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Clarence Thomas overcame humble beginnings and racial discrimination before earning elite educations, but they bring very different views about race-conscious college admissions to the Supreme Court as it weighs affirmative action challenges.
UNC-Chapel Hill and Harvard University next week will defend to the U.S. Supreme Court their race-conscious undergraduate admissions processes in cases that could overturn decades of precedent.
Fewer than a quarter of public four-year institutions, and only 40 percent of community colleges, meet a college access group’s definition of affordability.
The Chronicle asked legal and higher-education experts to share one key thing they will be watching for during Monday’s arguments. This is what they said.
Archive available here: davidson-clips.ongoodbits.com