Quick roundup of news and analysis of today's Supreme Court decision
🚨 Special Edition 🚨
SCOTUS Decision

Justices rule race-conscious admissions policies at Harvard and UNC are unconstitutional

Another of the liberal justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote in her dissent that “it would be deeply unfortunate if the Equal Protection Clause actually demanded this perverse, ahistorical, and counterproductive outcome.”

However, the chief justice also warned anyone who might be thinking that the essay could be used as a surreptitious means of racial selection.

David Brooks makes the case for class-based admissions.

Bans on race-conscious college admissions at the state level had quick effects.

The Supreme Court’s momentous decision was decades in the making.

One way to preserve diversity now that the Supreme Court has ruled against two colleges’ race-based admissions policies: Tell people the true price.

Can Colleges Be Racially Diverse Without Affirmative Action? Experience Suggests No

The Supreme Court’s decision to restrict racial considerations in affirmative action for university admissions could set the United States on a different path from some other countries that practice their own versions of affirmative action.

Now that the Supreme Court has struck down the use of race-conscious admissions at universities, conservative groups and legal experts say that the private sector should brace for challenges to their DEI initiatives.

Race, by definition, has never been neutral.

The gap between a more diverse America and less diverse elite colleges will only grow.

Archive available here: davidson-clips.ongoodbits.com
*|LIST:ADDRESS|*
Unsubscribe | View in browser